![]() ![]() ![]() Unlike the, which had to be lifted and assembled together with several other heavy components (a large, plus two ), VentureStar was to be simply inspected in a like an airplane.Also unlike the Space Shuttle, VentureStar would not have relied upon, which had to be hauled out of the ocean and then refurbished after each launch. VentureStar was expected to launch satellites into orbit at about 1/10 the cost of the Shuttle.Readying VentureStar for flight would have dramatically differed from that of the Space Shuttle. VentureStar would have stood approximately 17 shorter than the.VentureStar's engineering and design would have offered numerous advantages over the, representing considerable savings in time and materials, as well as increased safety. There were a number of other technologies that were part of the program, including the linear, and one point of praise was the metallic thermal protection system invented by BF Goodrich for the launch system. The X-33 had ongoing problems meeting performance requirements for the hydrogen carbon fiber fuel tank. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |